Nested Knowledge

Bringing Systematic Review to Life

User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:guide:plan

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
wiki:guide:plan [2022/04/22 15:51]
tiffany
wiki:guide:plan [2022/05/17 01:42]
tiffany
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Planning a Review or Meta-Analysis ======+====== Planning a Systematic Review ======
  
-  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Feasibility Search]]+  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is Your Systematic Review Feasible?]]
   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|Protocol Writing and Registration]]   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|Protocol Writing and Registration]]
  
-===== Defining strong research question and hypothesis include: =====+===== Consider Establishing Study Team =====
  
-  * Identifying the "primary and secondary aims of the study" +  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks and ensure that the study protocol is followed. 
-  * "Scanning the literature to identify gaps in the field" +  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewersor[[:wiki:autolit:admin:settings:users| team members]] to verify dataadjudicate study inclusion differences<font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68114196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process.</font>
-  * Using the acronym **P**opulation**I**ntervention**C**ontrol, and **O**utcome when formulating the research question+
  
-====   ====+----
  
-===== Establishing a Study Team =====+===== Key Planning Considerations =====
  
-  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks, ensure that "study protocol is followed", and "keeps all team members informed" +  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is your project viable]] or useful to the literature? 
-  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewers" <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>or team members to verify data, adjudicate</font> study inclusion <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>differences</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68, 114, 196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process</font> * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Include team members who are familiar with the review process</font> +  * Do you need to [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|write and register a protocol]] for your systematic review
-  * "The compexity of the question being addressed and the expected number of references also will figure in the size of the team"+
  
-=====   =====+----
  
-===== Assessing Feasibility ===== 
- 
-  * How to determine if the project is viable or useful to the literature 
-  * Checking if a review is already done, too little research, etc. 
-  * Knowing what a meta-analysis is good at and not good at 
- 
-=== References === 
- 
-Muka, T., Glisic, M., Milic, J. //et al.//  A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. //Eur J Epidemiol//**35, **49–60 (2020). [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5|https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5]] 
  
  
wiki/guide/plan.txt · Last modified: 2022/05/17 01:42 by tiffany