Nested Knowledge

Bringing Systematic Review to Life

User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:guide:plan

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
wiki:guide:plan [2022/04/29 16:29]
khutchison
wiki:guide:plan [2022/05/17 01:42]
tiffany
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Planning a Review or Meta-Analysis ======+====== Planning a Systematic Review ======
  
-  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is Your Systematic Review Feasible]]+  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is Your Systematic Review Feasible?]]
   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|Protocol Writing and Registration]]   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|Protocol Writing and Registration]]
  
-===== Define strong research question and hypothesis include: =====+===== Consider Establishing Study Team =====
  
-  * Identifying the "primary and secondary aims of the study" through creating a [[:wiki:guide:research:search|great literature search]]+  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks and ensure that the study protocol is followed. 
-  * Scan the current literature to identify gaps in the field. This can be done on PubMed. +  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewersor[[:wiki:autolit:admin:settings:usersteam members]] to verify dataadjudicate study inclusion differences<font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68114, 196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process.</font>
-  * Using the **PICO**  acronym **P**opulation**I**ntervention**C**ontrol, and **O**utcome when formulating the research question.+
  
-====   ====+----
  
-===== Establishing a Study Team =====+===== Key Planning Considerations =====
  
-  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks, and ensure that the study protocol is followed. +  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is your project viable]] or useful to the literature? 
-  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewers" or[[:wiki:guide:=wiki:autolit:admin:settings:usersteam members]] to verify data, adjudicate study inclusion differences <font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68, 114, 196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process.</font> +  * Do you need to [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|write and register a protocol]] for your systematic review
-=====   =====+
  
-===== Assessing Feasibility =====+----
  
-  * How to [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|determine if the project is viable]] or useful to the literature 
-  * Checking if a review is already done, too little research, etc. 
- 
-=== References === 
- 
-Muka, T., Glisic, M., Milic, J. //et al.//  A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. //Eur J Epidemiol//**35, **49–60 (2020). [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5|https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5]] 
  
  
wiki/guide/plan.txt · Last modified: 2022/05/17 01:42 by tiffany