Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:guide:plan [2022/04/22 15:52]
tiffany
+++ wiki:guide:plan [2022/05/17 01:42] (current)
tiffany [Key Planning Considerations]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Planning a Review or Meta-Analysis ======
+====== Planning a Systematic Review ======
   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is Your Systematic Review Feasible?]]
   * [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|Protocol Writing and Registration]]
-===== Defining a strong research question and hypothesis include: =====
+===== Consider Establishing a Study Team =====
-  * Identifying the "primary and secondary aims of the study"
+  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks and ensure that the study protocol is followed.
-  * "Scanning the literature to identify gaps in the field"
+  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewers" or[[:wiki:autolit:admin:settings:users| team members]] to verify data, adjudicate study inclusion differences<font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68, 114, 196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process.</font>
-  * Using the acronym **P**opulation, **I**ntervention, **C**ontrol, and **O**utcome when formulating the research question
-====   ====
+----
-===== Establishing a Study Team =====
+===== Key Planning Considerations =====
-  * Identify a team lead or project manager to organize project tasks, ensure that "study protocol is followed", and "keeps all team members informed"
+  * [[:wiki:guide:plan:quicksearch|Is your project feasible]]?
-  * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Identify</font>  "independent reviewers" <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>or team members to verify data, adjudicate</font> study inclusion <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>differences</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;rgb(68, 114, 196);;inherit>,</font> <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>and identify those that will participate in each step of the review process</font> * <font 11pt/Calibri,sans-serif;;inherit;;inherit>Include team members who are familiar with the review process</font>
+  * Do you need to [[:wiki:guide:plan:protocol|write and register a protocol]] for your systematic review?
-  * "The compexity of the question being addressed and the expected number of references also will figure in the size of the team"
-=====   =====
+----
-===== Assessing Feasibility =====
-  * How to determine if the project is viable or useful to the literature
-  * Checking if a review is already done, too little research, etc.
-  * Knowing what a meta-analysis is good at and not good at
-=== References ===
-Muka, T., Glisic, M., Milic, J. //et al.//  A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. //Eur J Epidemiol//**35, **49–60 (2020). [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5|https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5]]

Nested Knowledge

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools