This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:guide:research:rob [2021/10/07 23:02] alexmebane [Follow-through] |
wiki:guide:research:rob [2023/05/25 21:46] (current) jthurnham |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | <WRAP left round important 100%> This page needs revision </ | + | **Critical Appraisal** |
- | **Risk of Bias ** | + | **[[: |
- | ==== Introduction ==== | + | |
- | The extent to which a systematic review/ | + | **[[: |
- | The validity of a study may be considered | + | ==== Introduction |
- | Below are procedures for performing RoB assessments for systematic | + | The extent to which a systematic |
- | ==== Assign the quality control reviewer and independent RoB reviewers. ==== | + | The validity |
- | + | ||
- | - It is the responsibility | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Determine | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - Different | + | |
- | - Familiarize yourself | + | |
- | - Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network ([[https:// | + | |
- | - Randomized Controlled Trial | + | |
- | - Cohort | + | |
- | - Case Control | + | |
- | - Diagnostic Accuracy | + | |
- | - Economic Evaluations | + | |
- | - NOTE: The instructions for the SIGN RoB are quite long (100+ pages!). The good news is that most of the information is not particularly relevant for the majority of SR/MAs. For quick reference, the most important sections to review are page #51 and pages #56-66. Other sections may be useful depending on the project. | + | |
- | - modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS) | + | |
- | - Cohort | + | |
- | - Case Control | + | |
- | - Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) | + | |
- | - Case Report | + | |
- | - Case Series | + | |
- | - Cochrane | + | |
- | - Randomized Trial | + | |
- | - Non-Randomized Study | + | |
- | - Know which study designs you are including in the SR/MA. Be familiar with these study designs and choose the correct RoB template based on the studies included in the SR/MA. | + | |
- | - Normally, two RoB reviewers will complete an RoB individually. Do not collaborate on one with your fellow reviewer because your RoB assessment would be biased. | + | |
- | - An experienced QC reviewer should adjudicate results of the RoB and resolve any conflicts between RoB results from the independent reviewers. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Use the correct template: ==== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - Use the correct template for each study. Different study designs warrant the use of different templates. All templates exist as both Excel files and Google Sheets in the [[https:// | + | |
- | - [[https:// | + | |
- | - Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses | + | |
- | - [[https:// | + | |
- | | + | |
- | - Cochrane Templates: The Cochrane Templates have the most difficult instructions and will most likely not be used. The Cochrane Templates are applicable for both randomized studies (see [[https:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Follow-through ==== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === For independent RoB reviewers === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Perform the RoB assessment. When finished, email the QC reviewer | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * Note: If independent reviewers create their RoBs using the // <font inherit/ | + | |
- | ---- | + | ==== Download the Critical Appraisal or Risk of Bias Instructions ==== |
- | === For QC reviewer === | + | {{: |
- | - First, combine and compare indepedent RoB responses. This can be performed manually for small projects, but for larger projects, it is recommended to use the methods described in [[https:// | ||
- | - Adjudicate. | ||
- | - Write up the RoB results in the manuscript. See [[https:// | ||
- | ---- | ||