wiki:guide:write
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
wiki:guide:write [2022/01/30 17:48] erin.sheffels Added MA example |
wiki:guide:write [2023/06/07 00:28] (current) jthurnham [Statistical Analysis:] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| ==== Statistical Analysis: ==== | ==== Statistical Analysis: ==== | ||
| - | * Discuss the methods and type of Risk of Bias assessment that was used. As well as the statistical methods used to perform the network meta-analysis, | + | * Discuss the methods and type of Critical Appraisal |
| - | * In the Quantitative Synthesis tab, the Network Meta-Analysis infographic will appear inside the software. {{:wiki:guide: | + | * In the Quantitative Synthesis tab, the Network Meta-Analysis infographic will appear inside the software. |
| + | |||
| + | {{ :undefined:nmaaaa.png?nolink |}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | This NMA can be found here: [[https:// | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
| ===== Results ===== | ===== Results ===== | ||
| - | ==== Describe the PRISMA Flow Chart ==== | + | ==== Inserting Your PRISMA Flow Chart ==== |
| - | * State the number of articles that were screened and fulfilled the search criteria. | + | Nested Knowledge creates a PRISMA flowchart that you can include in your publication. It will summarize |
| ==== Subsections for results of each outcome of interest ==== | ==== Subsections for results of each outcome of interest ==== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 73: | ||
| * Cite all tables and figures that represent the outcomes of interest. | * Cite all tables and figures that represent the outcomes of interest. | ||
| * State all significant findings along with the statistical analyses. | * State all significant findings along with the statistical analyses. | ||
| - | * Include a Risk of Bias section if necessary. | + | * Include a Critical Appraisal |
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ===== Discussion ===== | + | ===== Discussion |
| * Keep the discussion brief and to the point. | * Keep the discussion brief and to the point. | ||
| * In the first paragraph, explain the major takeaway of the study. Ex: "Here, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that examined XX. We found that XX." | * In the first paragraph, explain the major takeaway of the study. Ex: "Here, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that examined XX. We found that XX." | ||
| * Put the study findings in context within the current literature. Mention any relevant, large, prospective studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). | * Put the study findings in context within the current literature. Mention any relevant, large, prospective studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). | ||
| * The limitations section should address anything that may hinder the strength of the statistical analysis. | * The limitations section should address anything that may hinder the strength of the statistical analysis. | ||
| - | * The conclusions section should state the significant findings of the included studies. | ||
| - | |||
| - | — // | ||
wiki/guide/write.1643564899.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/30 17:48 by erin.sheffels
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
