Nested Knowledge

Bringing Systematic Review to Life

User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:guide:overview

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:guide:overview [2022/01/25 15:22]
katcow
wiki:guide:overview [2023/06/07 00:25] (current)
jthurnham
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Overview ====== +====== What Are Systematic Reviews? ======
- +
-** <font 26px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>What are systematic reviews & meta-analyses?</font>  **+
  
 ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Systematic Review</font>  ** ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Systematic Review</font>  **
Line 11: Line 9:
   * <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Systematic reviews are useful for learning about general topics and relevant research</font>   * <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Systematic reviews are useful for learning about general topics and relevant research</font>
  
-** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Meta-analysis</font> **+** <font 26px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>How Are Systematic Reviews Conducted?</font> **
  
-// <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>A meta-analysis uses statistical methods to summarize the results of a systematic review.</font> // +----
-  * <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Meta-analysis = study of studies</font> +
-  * <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Meta-analyses use statistical methods to analyze the findings in multiple studies</font> +
-  * <font 11pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Meta-analyses can include a pooled estimate and confidence interval for the treatment effect after combining all the studies; test for whether the treatment or risk factor effect is statistically significant and test for heterogeneity between the studies</font>+
  
-** <font 26px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>How are systematic reviews & meta-analyses conducted?</font> ** +A great way to approach the development of systematic reviews (and meta-analysesis to break them down into smaller and more simple executable tasks. [[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5|"A 24-Step Guide on How to DesignConduct, and Successfully Publish Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Medical Research"]] is a helpful paper that provides authors with concrete steps to follow when starting the systematic review and/or meta-analysis process. These steps can be placed into the following general categories:
- +
-A great way to approach the development of systematic reviews and meta-analyses is to break them down into smaller and more simple executable tasks. [[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5|A 24-step guide on how to designconduct, and successfully publish systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research]] is a helpful tool that provides authors with concrete steps to follow when starting the systematic review and/or meta-analysis process. These steps can be placed into the following general categories:+
  
 ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Define and design</font> ** ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Define and design</font> **
  
-{{  :wiki:c5f16557dbd5301bf18c3d2797dc8c6e.png?direct&  }} <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Search and collect**</font>+{{ :undefined:reviewguide.png?nolink |}}
  
-{{  :wiki:7d189f113548eed62bfbe6e03e4f2267.png?direct&  }} <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Extract, evaluate, and consult "experts in the field" of interest**</font>+<font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Search and collect**</font>
  
-{{  :wiki:a192f9ed4870c860e7fe89e4699b1755.png?direct&  }} <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**"Summarize and explain findings"**</font>+{{ :undefined:reviewguide2.png?nolink |}}
  
-{{  :wiki:d91d2bc136029ec6330e7dfe936884fd.png?direct&  }}+<font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Extract, evaluate, and consult "experts in the field" of interest**</font> 
 + 
 +{{ :undefined:12-17.png?nolink |}}  
 + 
 +<font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**"Summarize and explain findings"**</font> 
 + 
 +{{ :undefined:18-21.png?nolink |}}
  
 ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Check publication bias and evidence quality</font> ** ** <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Check publication bias and evidence quality</font> **
  
-{{  :wiki:04e0f0953234ff63b1b82a90b91a1f9e.png?direct&  }} <font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Submit for publication**</font>+{{ :undefined:22-23.png?nolink |}} 
 + 
 +<font 20px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Submit for publication**</font>
  
-{{  :wiki:3e7bdbdc47bae4246973c3faa3d11bda.png?direct&300x104  }}+{{ :undefined:24.png?nolink |}}
  
-{{:wiki:6d710952725342798687e6a1b2cad191.png?direct&700  24-Step Guide for Conducting a Systematic Review, from Muka et al., 2019}}+{{ :undefined:reviewguide3.png?nolink |}}
  
 References References
wiki/guide/overview.1643124158.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/25 15:22 by katcow